keepersouha: (erm what?)
Samasu, Souha ([personal profile] keepersouha) wrote2010-08-24 01:18 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

... I just saw Sekuta going out with some girl in glasses and some frumpy outfit.

Is he... Seeing someone else?

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:37 am (UTC)(link)
You're still rather clumsy with it, though.

For more information? Details left out that might help identify them.

[identity profile] keepersouha.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:47 am (UTC)(link)
I am not clumsy at all. Mentally or physically.

... But there was a good chance that you wouldn't know them, so...

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
...you kinda are, Souha. It's alright, though. Everyone has some clumsiness.

That implies that they'd never show up again.

[identity profile] keepersouha.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
I think you're over-stating it.

... You've generally just confused me, at this point.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
...maybe a bit. I can see it, though. Just like how you refuse to be called 'cute'.

So don't think about it so much?

[identity profile] keepersouha.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 07:56 am (UTC)(link)
That's because being called cute while I'm a girl just sounds like flattery.

I'm going to stop thinking about it altogether.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 08:00 am (UTC)(link)
But you're so squeezibly soft...! Like a big bunny plushy. You've even got the hair and eyes for it!

Except, you know, being human. Which adds a whole other dynamic to it.

[identity profile] keepersouha.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
... Yes. Who is capable of still setting you on fire for comments like that.

[identity profile] pureplainpatron.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 08:09 am (UTC)(link)
...I really wish you wouldn't. Literally at least.

[identity profile] keepersouha.livejournal.com 2010-08-24 08:13 am (UTC)(link)
This isn't an appropriate "figuratively" for it.